Weathervane
About Weathervane Archives Site Map Contact Us
 

PRINT this Page
EMAIL this Page
CONTACT the Author
VIEW the Glossary

Understanding Transatlantic Differences

From the Archives
Confronting the Adverse Industry Impacts of Carbon Dioxide Abatement Policies: What Does it Cost?
Lawrence H. Goulder
Climate Issue Brief #23
September 2000

Environmentally and Economically Damaging Subsidies: Concepts and Illustrations
Carolyn Fischer and Michael A. Toman
Climate Issue Brief #14 October 1998; Revised August 2000

Revenue Recycling and the Costs of Reducing Carbon Emissions
Ian W.H. Parry
Climate Issue Brief #2
June 1997

From RFF Press
Link to RFF Press Book
Choosing Environmental Policy: Comparing Instruments and Outcomes in the United States and Europe
Winston Harrington, Richard Morgenstern,
Thomas Sterner, eds. RFF Press, 2004.


Home > Policy Design >
Taxes and Subsidies

In the absence of policy intervention, sources of greenhouse gas emissions bear no cost for their emissions. To provide the incentive to abate these emissions, policymakers can impose an emissions tax.  These sources would then find it economic to abate emissions so long as the cost of abating another unit of emissions is less than the amount of the tax. In response to the tax, the private sector will pursue low-cost emissions abatement first, and such a policy also ensures that all sources face the same price for emitting greenhouse gases.  

Subsidies for technologies that are climate-friendly – zero emissions or emissions-lean technologies – can also create the incentive for sources of greenhouse gas emissions to make capital investments that result in lower emissions.  By changing the relative prices of emissions-intensive and emissions-lean products in favor of the latter, these subsidies can spur investment in new technologies.  In addition, subsidies can address the socially suboptimal expenditures on R&D, especially basic R&D. 

Scholars at Resources for the Future have evaluated the effects of carbon taxes on the U.S. economy and compared the economy-wide impacts of carbon taxes with various forms of cap-and-trade programs and command-and-control regulations.  Research on fuel efficiency and the optimal gasoline taxes in the United States and the United Kingdom, with an explicit accounting of the climate damages associated with driving, has been another recent focus of RFF's efforts. Analyses of technology subsidies and R&D policies have also helped inform the policy arena about the role of technology policy as well as move the academic frontier.

Featured Work on This Topic

article image  

Combating Global Warming
Is taxation or cap-and-trade the better strategy for reducing greenhouse emissions?


Ian W.H. Parry and William A. Pizer
Regulation
Vol. 30, No. 3
Fall 2007

     
line
     
Link to Emission Trading Versus CO2 Taxes
 

Emission Trading versus CO2 Taxes

Ian W. H. Parry and William A. Pizer
Weathervane Backgrounder | May 2007

This Backgrounder compares and contrasts the two policy approaches and examines the extent to which the potential advantages of CO2 taxes might be captured in a hybrid emissions trading program through appropriate design features, such as safety valves and allowance auctioning.

     
     
 

Should We Abandon Cap-and-Trade in Favor of a CO2 Tax?

Ian W.H. Parry
RFF Web Feature
March 2007

     
     
Link to discussion paper
  Air Emissions of Ammonia and Methane from Livestock Operations: Valuation and Policy Options

Jhih-Shyang Shih, Dallas Burtraw, Karen L. Palmer, and Juha V. Siikamäki
Discussion Paper 06-11
March 2006
     
     
Link to Let's Get real on Energy Reform
 

Let's Get Real on Energy Reform

Joel Darmstadter
RFF Web Feature
March 2007

RFF Senior Fellow Joel Darmstadter comments in Newsday on how President Bush and Senator Clinton's plans ignore the best way to cut our dependence on oil: a high fuel tax.

     
 
Link to the Stern Review Event
 

The Stern Review and the Economic Analysis of Climate Change
An RFF Seminar

February 2007

     
 
Panel - Choice of Instruments  

Panel: The Choice of Instruments
Understanding Transatlantic Differences
An RFF Co-Hosted Seminar

Speakers address various methods for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, including priced-based market mechanisms and trading schemes and assess the pros and cons
of each.

 
 

 

Environmental and Technology Policies for Climate Change and Renewable Energy

Carolyn Fischer and Richard G. Newell

Discussion Paper 04-05, April 2004
Revised June 2005

Some of the most popular ways for supporting renewable energy are the least efficient at reducing carbon dioxide emissions. The most efficient way is also the least popular, setting out a dilemma for policymakers.

 
 

 

A Carbon Tax In Time, Saves Nine

Paul Portney
RFF Web Feature
June 2005

Former RFF President Paul Portney proposes a carbon tax on fossil fuels to address a number of the most pressing problems facing the United States.

     
 

Link to Discussion Paper  

Can an Effective Global Climate Treaty Be Based on Sound Science, Rational Economics, and Pragmatic Politics?

Robert N. Stavins

Discussion Paper 04-28
May 2004

     
 

 

Fiscal Interactions and the Case for Carbon Taxes over Grandfathered Carbon Permits

Ian W.H. Parry

Discussion Paper 03-46
December 2003

     
 

Market Power and Output-Based Refunding of Environmental Policy Revenues
Carolyn Fischer
Discussion Paper 03-27 | May 2003
Combining Rate-Based and Cap-and-Trade Emissions Policies
Carolyn Fischer
Discussion Paper 03-32 | May 2003
Output-Based Allocation of Environmental Policy Revenues and Imperfect Competition
Carolyn Fischer
Discussion Paper 02-60 | January 2003
Are Tradable Emissions Permits a Good Idea?
Ian W.H. Parry
Issue Brief 02-33 | November 2002
Adjusting Carbon Cost Analyses to Account for Prior Tax Distortions
Ian W.H. Parry
Discussion Paper 02-47 | August 2002
Multilateral Trade Agreements and Market-Based Environmental Policies
Carolyn Fischer, Sandra A. Hoffmann, and Yutaka Yoshino
Discussion Paper 02-28 | May 2002
Does Britain or the United States Have the Right Gasoline Tax?
Ian W.H. Parry and Kenneth Small
Discussion Paper 02-12 | March 2002; Revised September 2004
International Emissions Trading Design and Tax Shifting by Multinational Corporations
Carolyn Fischer
Climate Issue Brief 02-01 | January 2002
Is There a Rationale for Rebating Environmental Levies?
Alain Bernard, Carolyn Fischer, and Marc Vielle
Discussion Paper 01-31 | October 2001
Rebating Environmental Policy Revenues: Output-Based Allocations and Tradable Performance Standards
Carolyn Fischer
Discussion Paper 01-22 | July 2001
Multinational Taxation and International Emissions Trading
Carolyn Fischer
Discussion Paper 01-18 | April 2001

 

 

1616 P Street NW, Washington, DC 20036 Phone: 202.328.5000 email:weathervane@rff.org